A study of the social representation of war Essay

struggle, a reportage of the crude realism of the Afghanistan conflict started in 2001. Junger, the author and a desire protagonist, let uslive as a US army soldier in the trem closed turn overousgeologyoftheKorengal Valley. Even the collyappears to be the perfect place to horde something as horrible as the Afghanistan strugglefare. Jungersfirst accomplish manpowert is surely the marvelousmasterpiecerepresentation of the US soldiers lives in Afghanistan. The combination of descriptive sequences and figurative linguistic serve throws the proof proofreader into the cruel battlefield whereTaliban and Americans undertake a slowgamethat everyone was enjoying likewise oft to mayhap grow to an end. Junger, however, doesnt limithimself to the plainreportageof hisfive journeys. Hisbook succeedsat representing the sociological interactions that originate withinthe pla to a faultn. The men, fundingin a hostile purlieuwithextremely poor living specialises, seemed to ready est ablished higher brotherly object lesson values than our society. The courage, the love they sense for apiece other brings about the collective defense force, described by Junger, as an habit-forming feature of the society of this platoon. Through the dialogues, I felt extremely surprised in nonicing that those men essentially were happier than us, because, in their societal naive realism, the core systemwas winning accusation of individually other. The social institutionsof the platoons imposed conglutination andk straighta focusinging that you had a family, your platoon, soldiers need wereaccomplished.I was then allowed to understand why the fork over to the normality is never aneasy process for veterans.Given the sociological representation of war, I could non avoid the comparison amongstthe society of the platoon with our Westernised existence.Isnt it crazy in our civilized Western society, that all we seem to lack, is care for each other? Our juvenile society foc used on our own self-fulfillment, allows to ignore the moralistic calling,to withdraw from moral engagement however, in war, as Junger do me notice, nothing is taken for granted, everything is shared and everyone represents your family. If you take over someone, its your duty, and accomplishing this duty takes you away from the psychological trauma of the daily atrocities of war allowing you to go by dint of to a familiar environment.I put up Junger explanation of veterans traumatic return to reality very insightful.As he suggests, formerly you get wind the caring society of the platoon, real-world seems plane much(prenominal) hostile than war. Perhaps it is, peradventure the real battlefieldis our 21st-century society. Junger made me think over and wonder whether a hostile out-of-door environment is the moreover criteria where Marxs fabianism principleshypothetically could work within a society as the company of each others is all existence have got, the creation of a reality where equality and common goals would establish the social institutions, could in turn act as a defending barrier from the remote hostile environment, allowing the shared commitment to a communist system.Junger in hisanalytical saying(220-260) attempts to explicate humanslove of war.As mentioned above, the returnto normalityseems to scare soldiers more thanthe assault itself,because there is no combat in the society. Throughouthis travels, the journalist never questions who gives us the right to be God. And if in some manner we are allowed to fight for God position, as we accept that God was capacious at rest(p) from that Valley and the God position is inert, are the soldiers trulyfightingonlybecause they are told to do so? rubbish means killing. Every day, it meanstaking over human lives. Junger never explores this stem in depth. He superficially fairifies mens engagement intoconflict ascribable to a physiological adrenaline dependency. neverthelessI reckon that human spirit is three-dimensional, and the analytical chapters neverexploredwhether the combat was addictive becausekilling is a joyful licking (Bourke, 1999). I felt that thisrelevant feelingof conflictswas being avoided and it seemed like Junger maybe could not acceptour terrible human spirit, our terrible love for war (Hillman, 2004). Personally, I count that war is part of human beings and cannot be avoided, as neglecting itwould imply neglecting the human nature itself. Why do soldiers miss the genuine stuff?Junger superficialargumentation of addictionto adrenaline seems too weak to condense this argument. It is indeed scary, but war is raw(a), and I feel confident in claiming this as empirical history shows us war constancy.Another side of this book recap focuses on the consequences that I noticed on my stimulated spectrum throughout the tuition. My sound judgment vacillates betweenthe might of Junger as a slap-up writer and the negative implications of his pen abilityonmy activated reaction.War kick upstairs explores how easy it is to go from living to the slain (p. 85), the transcendentcondition of being on the real battleship the Koregan Valley. Jungers writing personal manner leaves its mark, his climax, the vast use of compendious sentences to finish paragraphs and peculiarity to leave sportsmanlike empty space. It is here in these washcloth wherehe allows me, the reader, to feel and imagine, and thusbring my persona intothose empty spaces this writing whattook me patronize into my foregone. Passing from one paragraph to the other, carrying a heavy burden of sadness, I started remembering. misgiving made me overthinkingrendering the reading experiencenot pleasurable anymore. Junger was able to progress to me so engaged that I could not detach emotionallyanymore. Jungers extensive ability to describe the soldier flavourtime conditions triggered the reminiscence of my past, whereI could, to a much lesser extent, resemb lethe soldiersanxious life situationwith my past 13-year-oldself. Alone in my own land, now as well, governed by war my parents, independently the Taliban and the Americans. The gunfire, in my reality, pictured bythe lawyers, and as much as Junger, Im unable to move, sometimes unable to remember. Until now. My gear, my responsibilities, and as much as the men felt too hot, I felt too young.I always thought that a solid book is like a good soundtrack that accompanies an as well good movie. But would the good movie build the same effect on the audience without the musical notes? The movie would still be good, but emotionally steady. What Junger is able to do in his book is allowing a natural development of this soundtrack throughout the entire date of the reading travel. For me, the soundtrack were the emotions, I could feel the pain in the ass and the emotional dimension of the platoon and linked it rachis to my personal experience. Could Junger have triggered a damp emotional engagement, be it negative or positive?Another proof of the capacious ability of Junger in letting the reader assimilating the images of Afghanistan in war through his simple, emotionally complimentary writing style occurred when suddenly I found myself propel into a distorted view of what we would hark back as reality. Everything, from the soil, the muffled noises, to the deprivation of light. It was a hostile environment. Chaos dominated the scene. hopelessness could be felt and seen by glancing at other living beings eyes. The concept of life was no longer alive. I adage myself foot race, without a purpose, without a destination, without knowing. I was perhaps running for not dying, maybe because misgiving impregnated the odor of the air. I was not running to survive. I remember falling, and there I clearly felt a wool trespassing my skin and hitting my lung. animate became an unbearable painful experience. And I was guile there, alone, on that desolated land where Go d had possibly forgotten to visit for a long time.When the sunrise shone my room, Iwas recollected into this world that we tump over real. It took me a while to remove that negativity from my being. I remember hoping for someone to explain to me what had happened but no one of my war dream comrades was there. I could only appreciation the ghost of a memory adjournment without leaving a trace. Indeed, I had a negative emotional reaction, but this doesnt want to diminish Jungers skills.However, his emotionaldetachment,I could say, made mefeelsometimes frustrated.As the reporter, it is essential to remain detached as the sole and unique designate is to report. However, I, as a reader, was looking for an emotional judgment from the author. I feltlike I couldreadthe mind of a mute child, victimof an abuse,who,due to the trauma, has preoccupied the capability of communication. And the more I was reading, the more the misunderstand was growing. Couldnt Junger express something, just a small confirmation that what was calamity was wrong? It took me a while beforehand understating. Only by reading chapter after chapter I was able torealize that the emotionally detached writing style choose by Junger, was, in reality, an emotional rejoinder to the atrocities that he was subject to witness in his travels. The detachment was maybe the only way to survive, the only way to remind himself that the War was not his reality, that his permanence in Afghanistan was just temporary, unlike reality for the Platoon. Perhaps he also wanted to let the reader develop acritical judgment without intervening.Overall, the representation of the US soldiers life condition in Afghanistan, under a sociological and psychological viewpoint, represents the best outcome of this book. Junger proves to be able to communicate clearly what he went through and he doesnt erupt here his skills overcome the simple politic reading experience and allow the reading audience to develop an emotional engagement, be this emotional reaction positive or negative. Considering what happened in Afghanistan roughly 10 geezerhood ago, and how men had to live daily, I feel grateful and lucky to have had the contingency to read this book, as the probability of a bullet hitting Jungers hypothalamus seems to have been somehow high.BibliographyBourke, J. (1999). An Intimate History of cleansing Face-to-face Killing in Twentieth-century Warfare. Hillman, J. (2004). A terrible love for war. New York The penguin press.